I feel like the feedback that I received during the peer reflection was really good and will definitely help me improve my paper overall.  Some of the main positive feedback that I received was that I was good at putting my voice and my experiences into the paper. I also got feedback that I came up with a good title. He also noted that I did a good job incorporating Dunbar’s number and explaining it. The main negative feedback that I received was that the paper needs more of the author’s voice in it. He pointed out that I could use more examples from the text to back up my claim and personal experiences.

While I was editing my peers’ work I gave positive and negative feedback. My peer did an excellent job including the text in his work to back up his claim. I especially like how he told us who Robert Dubar is to help give him credibility. The main negative feedback that i gave my peer is that he could be more specific and elaborate more like when he states his opinions like when he says he “partially agrees” he can explain a little more why he feels that way. I also said that he should go into more depth with his conclusion because the end kind of leaves you hanging. Overall I really liked the direction he was going and I liked seeing how someone else approached the assignment. I agree with the main idea in my peers’ essay that social media is more harmful than helpful.